SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Martin T, Weatherall M, Anderson TJ, Macaskill MR. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2015; 39(3): 179-184.

Affiliation

New Zealand Brain Research Institute (T.M., T.J.A, M.R.M.), Christchurch, New Zealand; University of Otago, Wellington, Department of Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit (T.M., M.W.), University of Otago, Wellington, Department of Medicine, New Zealand (M.W.), University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand (T.J.A. M.R.M), Christchurch Public Hospital, Department of Neurology, Christchurch, New Zealand (T.J.A.).

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Neurology Section, American Physical Therapy Association)

DOI

10.1097/NPT.0000000000000093

PMID

26050074

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Freezing of gait (FOG) increases fall risk in persons with Parkinson disease (PD). Cueing improves gait parameters associated with freezing, but it is unclear whether a cueing program can address falling.

METHODS: We used a parallel-groups delayed- (n = 12) or immediate-start (n = 9) randomized controlled trial design to evaluate a cueing exercise program for FOG and falls in participants with PD. Each group received preintervention falls monitoring, followed by a 6-month standardized, home-based, cueing exercise and education program. Participant questionnaires rated program value and compliance. Freezing was measured with the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ). Falls were recorded by weekly diaries.

RESULTS: Self-reported adherence was high; 83% of participants reported exercising after 6 months. Participants reported that the program was beneficial (89%), walking improved (78%), falls were fewer (73%), and self-management of freezing improved (61%). Mean (standard deviation) NFOGQ scores were 14.8 (5.0), for the immediate (n = 10), and 16.0 (7.7) for the delayed group (n = 9), after 6 months (difference -1.0 [95% confidence interval, -7.9 to 6.0; P = 0.78]). With baseline NFOGQ scores as a covariate, the estimate of difference was -0.7 (95% confidence interval, -6.1 to 4.7; P = 0.79). The relative rate of falls for immediate compared with delayed groups was 1.22 (95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 3.26).

CONCLUSIONS: The cueing program intervention is acceptable and participants feel they improve; however, this small feasibility study lacks statistical power to detect important changes in falls rates or FOG severity. A larger study is warranted to further investigate the potential to influence FOG and falls.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A105).


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print