|
Affiliation
|
Author Affiliations: Doctoral Candidate, Doctoral Programme of Nursing Science (Ms Lantta), Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Professor of Clinical Forensic Psychology (Dr Daffern), Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science (CFBS), Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia; Project Director of Psychiatry and Director of Nursing (Dr Kontio), Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; and Professor, Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, and Director of Nursing, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Dr Välimäki). |
|
Abstract
|
PURPOSE: The aims of this study are to explain the intervention of implementing a structured violence risk assessment procedure in mental health inpatient units using the Ottawa Model of Research Use (OMRU) as a guiding framework and to consider nurses' perspectives of its clinical utility and implementation process.
BACKGROUND: Patient aggression toward staff is a global concern in mental health units. The limited extant literature exploring the use of structured violence risk assessments in mental health units, although small and inconsistent, reveals some positive impacts on the incidence of aggression and staff's use of restrictive interventions. RATIONALE: Although numerous violence risk assessment instruments have been developed and tested, their systematic implementation and use are still limited. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: A project titled "Safer Working Management" (111298) was conducted in a Finnish hospital district, across 3 mental health units. The 6 steps of OMRU were followed during implementation of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression (DASA). OUTCOME: Nurses' views toward structured violence risk assessment procedures varied. Although implementation of the DASA was seen as a useful method to increase discussions with patients and nursing staff, some staff preferred their own clinical judgment for assessment of violence risk.
CONCLUSION: It is possible to use a specific model to promote the implementation of risk assessment instruments in mental health units. However, the complex mental health inpatient environment and the difficulties in understanding and managing aggressive patients present challenges for the implementation of structured violence risk assessment methods. IMPLICATIONS: The OMRU provides a tool for clinical nurse specialists to guide implementation process in mental health units. Clinical nurse specialists must promote training for staff regarding use of new innovations, such as the DASA. Implementation processes should be reviewed so that clinical nurse specialists can lead and support mental health staff to properly use structured violence risk assessment measures.
Language: en |