Citation

Simon LS, Hurst C, Kelley K, Judge TA. J. Appl. Psychol. 2015; 100(6): 1798-1810.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/apl0000031

PMID

26011719

Abstract

Fundamental to the definition of abusive supervision is the notion that subordinates are often victims of a pattern of mistreatment (Tepper, 2000). However, little research has examined the processes through which such destructive relational patterns emerge. In this study, we draw from and extend the multimotive model of reactions to interpersonal threat (Smart Richman & Leary, 2009) to formulate and test hypotheses about how employees' emotional and behavioral responses may ameliorate or worsen supervisors' abuse. To test this model, we collected 6 waves of data from a sample of 244 employees.

RESULTS revealed reciprocal relationships between abusive supervision and both supervisor-directed counterproductive behavior and supervisor-directed avoidance. Whereas the abusive supervision-counterproductive behavior relationship was partially driven by anger, the abusive supervision-avoidance relationship was partially mediated by fear. These findings suggest that some may find themselves in abusive relationships, in part, because their own reactions to mistreatment can, perhaps unknowingly, reinforce abusive behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record

Language: en