SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jennings WG, Richards TN, Smith MD, Bjerregaard B, Fogel SJ. Soc. Sci. Res. 2015; 52: 47-58.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.01.007

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

A small body of prior research has examined the impact of victim sex on jury death penalty decision-making and the majority of this research has demonstrated some evidence of a "female victim effect" such that cases involving a female victim are more likely to receive the death penalty than similarly situated cases with a male victim. However, within this line of research studies have suggested that victim sex may work in conjunction with other case characteristics. In order to further explore this phenomenon, the current study examines a near-population of death penalty cases from North Carolina (n = 1069) from 1977-2009 using propensity score matching.

RESULTS demonstrate that once cases are matched on more than 50 legal and extralegal case characteristics, there is no statistically significant or substantive link between victim sex and death penalty decision-making.

FINDINGS suggest that it is concrete differences in the legal and extralegal factors observed in cases with female victims compared to male victims that shape jury death sentence decisions rather than a direct effect of victim sex (before matching: OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.20-1.95; p <.001/after matching: OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.66-1.24; p =.52). Study limitations and implications are also discussed.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print