Citation

de Zoete J, Sjerps M, Lagnado D, Fenton NE. Sci. Justice 2015; 55(3): 209-217.

Affiliation

Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: n.fenton@qmul.ac.uk.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Forensic Science Society, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.scijus.2014.11.005

PMID

25934374

Abstract

When two or more crimes show specific similarities, such as a very distinct modus operandi, the probability that they were committed by the same offender becomes of interest. This probability depends on the degree of similarity and distinctiveness. We show how Bayesian networks can be used to model different evidential structures that can occur when linking crimes, and how they assist in understanding the complex underlying dependencies. That is, how evidence that is obtained in one case can be used in another and vice versa. The flip side of this is that the intuitive decision to "unlink" a case in which exculpatory evidence is obtained leads to serious overestimation of the strength of the remaining cases.

Language: en