Citation

Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Carlozzi N, Bushnik T, Sherer M, Choi SW, Heinemann AW, Chiaravalloti N, Sander AM, Englander J, Hanks R, Kolakowsky-Hayner S, Roth E, Gershon R, Rosenthal M, Cella D. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015; 31(1): 40-51.

Affiliation

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware College of Health Sciences, Newark (Dr Tulsky and Ms Kisala); Kessler Foundation Research Center, West Orange, New Jersey (Drs Tulsky, Chiaravalloti, and Rosenthal); New York University Langone Medical Center, New York (Dr Bushnik); Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Drs Victorson, Heinemann, Roth, Gershon, and Cella); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (Dr Carlozzi); TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, Texas (Drs Sherer and Sander); McGraw-Hill Education CTB, Monterey, California (Dr Choi); Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Drs Heinemann and Roth); Rutgers NJ University Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey (Dr Chiaravalloti); Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (Dr Sander); Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, Santa Clara, California (Drs Englander and Kolakowsky-Hayner); and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan (Dr Hanks).

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/HTR.0000000000000131

PMID

25931184

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use a patient-centered approach or participatory action research design combined with advanced psychometrics to develop a comprehensive patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measurement system specifically for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This TBI Quality-of-Life (TBI-QOL) measurement system expands the work of other large PRO measurement initiatives, that is, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and the Neurology Quality-of-Life measurement initiative. SETTING: Five TBI Model Systems centers across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with TBI.

DESIGN: Classical and modern test development methodologies were used. Qualitative input was obtained from individuals with TBI, TBI clinicians, and caregivers of individuals with TBI through multiple methods, including focus groups, individual interviews, patient consultation, and cognitive debriefing interviews. Item pools were field tested in a large multisite sample (n = 675) and calibrated using item response theory methods. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Twenty-two TBI-QOL item banks/scales.

RESULTS: The TBI-QOL consists of 20 independent calibrated item banks and 2 uncalibrated scales that measure physical, emotional, cognitive, and social aspects of health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS: The TBI-QOL measurement system has potential as a common data element in TBI research and to enhance collection of health-related quality-of-life and PRO data in rehabilitation research and clinical settings.

Language: en