Citation

Bosanac P, Hamilton B, Beatson J, Trett R, Rao S, Mancuso S, Castle D. Australas. Psychiatry 2015; 23(3): 277-281.

Affiliation

Chair of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Mental Health, Fitzroy, VIC, and; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1039856215586148

PMID

25944765

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A proof-of-concept study over an 18-month period to determine whether a mentalization-based intervention (MBI) in a metropolitan community mental health service, when added to a recovery-based model of care, would be of clinical benefit to borderline personality disorder (BPD) consumers with a history of recurrent, deliberate self-harm. The feasibility of implementing the intervention, and factors that could improve its implementation, will be evaluated.

METHODS: Three-monthly focus groups with participating community mental health service case managers (N = 8) assessed the implementation and the impact of an MBI added to a recovery model of care and the way the clinicians worked with consumers with BPD and recurrent, deliberate self-harm in this context.

RESULTS: Qualitative analysis revealed compatibility of the MBI with a recovery-based case management approach for the above group of consumers, albeit with operational barriers.

CONCLUSIONS: MBI with consumers with BPD appears to be compatible with recovery-focused psychiatric case management and was accepted by consumers. The case managers perceived that no harm was rendered in terms of deliberate self-harm and acute service utilization. The MBI led to a sense of improved therapeutic alliance in case managers working with consumers.

Language: en