Citation

Press J. Int. J. Psychoanal. 2015; 97(1): 89-113.

Affiliation

Geneva, 62, Quai Gustave Ador, 1207, Geneva, Switzerland. jacques.press@bluewin.ch.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Institute of Psychoanalysis, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/1745-8315.12334

PMID

25885928

Abstract

The author starts by treating the general epistemological problems inherent to research and emphasizes that all investigation takes place between two poles: a creative pole and one that is defensive in relation to the unknown and formlessness. In the psychosomatic field, an additional difficulty resides in the western dualistic vision of the relationship between psyche and soma which influences our way of thinking about the body as well as about otherness. The author continues by exploring Pierre Marty's psychosomatic model. Its psychosomatic monism is revolutionary but incomplete and creates a distance with the other, the somatizing patient, resulting in a medically oriented nosology symptomatic of the impossibility to think about some of the most important aspects of counter-transference. With the help of clinical material, the author considers these unthought aspects and some of their theoretical implications, particularly the way of understanding the negative often so prevalent with these patients. Based on these reflections as well as Freud's on beyond the pleasure principle and Winnicott's theorization on the fear of breakdown, the author suggests some directions for research. Somatic illness might occur when the attempts at filling the cracks created by a breakdown are unsuccessful.

Language: en