SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Rimstad R, Sollid SJ. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 2015; 8: 4.

Affiliation

Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Holterveien 24, 1448 Drøbak, Norway ; Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 41, 4036 Stavanger, Norway ; Air Ambulance Department, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0424 Oslo, Nydalen Norway.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1186/s12245-015-0052-9

PMID

25852774

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A core task for commanders in charge of an emergency response operation is to make decisions. The purposes of the study were to describe what critical decisions the ambulance commander and the medical commander make in a mass casualty incident response and to explore what the underlying conditions affecting decision-making are. The study was conducted in the context of the 2011 government district terrorist bombing in Norway.

METHODS: The study was a retrospective, descriptive observational study collecting data through participating observation, semi-structured interviews, and recordings of emergency medical services' radio communications. Analysis was conducted using systematic text condensation. The ambulance commander was interviewed using the critical decision method.

RESULTS: The medical emergency response lasted 6.5 h, with little clinical activity after 2 h. Most critical decisions were made within the first 30 min, with the ambulance commander making the bulk of decisions. Situation assessment and underlying uncertainties strongly affected decision-making, but there was a mutual interaction between these three factors that developed throughout the different stages of the operation. Knowledge and experience were major determinants of how easily commanders picked up sensory cues and translated them into situation assessments. The number and magnitude of uncertainties were largest in the development stage, after most of the critical decisions had been made.

CONCLUSIONS: In the studied mass casualty incident, the commanders made most critical decisions in the early stages of the emergency response when resources did not meet demand. Decisions were made under significant uncertainty and time pressure. Ambulance and medical commanders should be prepared to make situation assessments and decisions early and be ready to adjust as uncertainties are reduced.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print