Citation

Summala H. Transp. Hum. Fact. 2000; 2(3): 217-226.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Traffic Research Unit, University of Helsinki

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1207/STHF0203_2

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In his review on driver brake reaction times (RTs), Green (2000) rightly criticizes attempts to seek a canonical brake RT, and proposes to determine expected brake RT for specific situations. However, based on his analysis, he presents a series of values for expected, unexpected, and surprise situations that appear to generalize over a variety of different driver tasks and traffic situations without sufficient concern for urgency or criticality of the situations. This sampling problem may lead easily to biased and somewhat arbitrary estimates. Thus, instead of 1.25 sec for "unexpected" situations, the median yellow response time for the critical conditions (at short time-to-stop-line) is rather below 1.0 sec, and instead of 1.5 sec mean brake RT for surprise situations, available on-road data suggest that in fairly urgent situations-at time-to-collision of about 4.0 sec-unalerted drivers are able to react to an obstacle by braking at an average latency of 1.0 to 1.3 sec, depending on site. More emphasis should be given to analyzing (and producing) real-life data on driver reactions as a function of situational and driver-centered variables, and of criticality.