Citation

Sijtsma K, Veldkamp CL, Wicherts JM. Psychometrika 2015; 81(1): 33-38.

Affiliation

Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands, k.sijtsma@tilburguniversity.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Psychometric Society)

DOI

10.1007/s11336-015-9444-2

PMID

25820978

Abstract

We respond to the commentaries Waldman and Lilienfeld (Psychometrika, 2015) and Wigboldus and Dotch (Psychometrika, 2015) provided in response to Sijtsma's (Sijtsma in Psychometrika, 2015) discussion article on questionable research practices. Specifically, we discuss the fear of an increased dichotomy between substantive and statistical aspects of research that may arise when the latter aspects are laid entirely in the hands of a statistician, remedies for false positives and replication failure, and the status of data exploration, and we provide a re-definition of the concept of questionable research practices.

Language: en