Citation

Bridgeman J. Med. Law Rev. 2015; 23(3): 477-489.

Affiliation

Sussex Law School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QE, England j.c.bridgeman@sussex.ac.uk.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London, Publisher Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/medlaw/fwv006

PMID

25823385

Abstract

This commentary critically examines the role of the law in the conflict over the post-operative care of five-year-old Ashya King. It argues that misunderstanding, threats, and fear of the law contributed to the deteriorating relationship between his parents and the professionals caring for him. The commentary analyses the judgment, in wardship proceedings, of Baker J arguing that too much weight was placed upon the responsibilities of Ashya's parents and an insufficient account provided of his best interests or of the principled basis for preferring innovative and, as yet, unproven therapy only available, privately funded, abroad to conventional treatment for a child with a life-threatening condition.

Language: en