Citation

Gildberg FA, Fristed P, Makransky G, Moeller EH, Nielsen LD, Bradley SK. J. Forensic Nurs. 2015; 11(1): 41-50.

Affiliation

1Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark; 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark; 3Department of Psychiatry, Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark; 4Faculty of Health Science, Institute of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark; and 5Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College, Cork.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, International Association of Forensic Nurses, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1097/JFN.0000000000000055

PMID

25622065

Abstract

Evidence suggests the prevalence and duration of mechanical restraint are particularly high among forensic psychiatric inpatients. However, only sparse knowledge exists regarding the reasons for, and characteristics of, prolonged use of mechanical restraint in forensic psychiatry. This study therefore aimed to investigate prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint on forensic psychiatric inpatients. Documentary data from medical records were thematically analyzed.

RESULTS show that the reasons for prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint on forensic psychiatric inpatients can be characterized by multiple factors: "confounding" (behavior associated with psychiatric conditions, substance abuse, medical noncompliance, etc.), "risk" (behavior posing a risk for violence), and "alliance parameters" (qualities of the staff-patient alliance and the patients' openness to alliance with staff), altogether woven into a mechanical restraint spiral that in itself becomes a reason for prolonged mechanical restraint. The study also shows lack of consistent clinical assessment during periods of restraint. Further investigation is indicated to develop an assessment tool with the capability to reduce time spent in mechanical restraint.

Language: en