Citation

Nandi A, Harper S. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep. 2014; 2(1): 61-70.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s40471-014-0031-3

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

A number of authors have suggested that epidemiology generally, and social epidemiology in particular, should be producing more consequential research to inform specific interventions for improving population health. However, the extent to which current research in social epidemiology prioritizes consequentialist questions is unknown. To provide some quantitative evidence on this question, we collected all abstracts accepted for either an oral or poster presentation at the annual meetings of the Society for Epidemiologic Research between 2009 and 2013. We identified all abstracts relating to the study of social determinants of health and classified each abstract as consequentialist if it evaluated the effect of a specific intervention. Among 619 abstracts examining social determinants of health, we classified 41 studies (6.6 % of total) as consequentialist, with minimal year-to-year variation. Little of social epidemiology appears to be focused on consequential research. Changes in pedagogy and greater involvement with the policy community may help.

Language: en