Citation

Miller CH, Ivanov B, Sims J, Compton J, Harrison KJ, Parker KA, Parker JL, Averbeck JM. Hum. Commun. Res. 2013; 39(1): 127-155.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, International Communication Association, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01438.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The efficacy of inoculation theory has been confirmed by decades of empirical research, yet optimizing its effectiveness remains a vibrant line of investigation. The present research turns to psychological reactance theory for a means of enhancing the core mechanisms of inoculation--threat and refutational preemption.

FINDINGS from a multisite study indicate reactance enhances key resistance outcomes, including: threat, anger at attack message source, negative cognitions, negative affect, anticipated threat to freedom, anticipated attack message source derogation, perceived threat to freedom, perceived attack message source derogation, and counterarguing. Most importantly, reactance-enhanced inoculations result in lesser attitude change--the ultimate measure of resistance.

Language: en