Citation

Piñero DP, Alcón N. Clin. Exp. Optom. 2014; 98(2): 107-116.

Affiliation

Department of Ophthalmology (Oftalmar), Medimar International Hospital, Alicante, Spain; Foundation for the Visual Quality, Fundación para la Calidad Visual, Alicante, Spain; Departament of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Spain.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Optometrists Association Australia, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/cxo.12230

PMID

25470213

Abstract

Biomechanics is often defined as 'mechanics applied to biology'. Due to the variety and complexity of the behaviour of biological structures and materials, biomechanics is better defined as the development, extension and application of mechanics for a better understanding of physiology and physiopathology and consequently for a better diagnosis and treatment of disease and injury. Different methods for the characterisation of corneal biomechanics are reviewed in detail, including those that are currently commercially available (Ocular Response Analyzer and CorVis ST). The clinical applicability of the parameters provided by these devices are discussed, especially in the fields of glaucoma, detection of ectatic disorders and orthokeratology. Likewise, other methods are also reviewed, such as Brillouin microscopy or dynamic optical coherence tomography and others with potential application to clinical practice but not validated for in vivo measurements, such as ultrasonic elastography. Advantages and disadvantages of all these techniques are described. Finally, the concept of biomechanical modelling is revised as well as the requirements for developing biomechanical models, with special emphasis on finite element modelling.

Language: en