Citation

Pincomb GA, Lovallo WR, Passey RB, Wilson MF. Am. J. Cardiol. 1988; 61(10): 798-802.

Affiliation

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Behavioral Sciences Laboratories, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1988, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

3354444

Abstract

Caffeine use during exposure to mental stress is an extremely common occurrence. Because both have been shown to alter blood pressure (BP) and its underlying hemodynamic mechanisms, the potential exists for additive or even synergistic effects. Changes in heart rate, BP and noninvasive thoracic impedance measures of left ventricular function were examined in young men (ages 20 to 36) at rest and during a demanding behavioral task performed 40 minutes after predosing with caffeine (3.3 mg/kg, equivalent to 2 to 3 cups of coffee) or placebo in a double-blind crossover design. All subjects were healthy young men without history of cardiovascular disease, regular use of nicotine, recreational or prescription drugs or caffeine intolerance. Caffeine abstinence was required for 12 hours before each test session. Systolic and diastolic BP were elevated by both caffeine and the behavioral task alone (p less than 0.01 for each); when combined, caffeine's pressor effects were additive to those of the behavioral task. However, caffeine's pressor effect was produced by different mechanisms depending on the behavioral state. Caffeine increased systemic vascular resistance (p less than 0.01) under resting conditions, but it enhanced cardiac output (p less than 0.01) during behavioral arousal associated with the task. The combined influence of caffeine and the task increased the number of men in whom peak systolic BP reached hypertensive levels, and also synergistically increased cardiac minute work (p less than 0.01) and the rate-pressure product estimate of myocardial oxygen demand (p less than 0.05). Implications of these findings are discussed for long standing theoretical disputes regarding caffeine, its health consequences, and for methodologic issues in behavioral and clinical studies.

Language: en