SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Elmquist J, Hamel J, Shorey RC, Labrecque L, Ninnemann A, Stuart GL. Partner Abuse 2014; 5(4): 359-374.

Affiliation

University of Tennessee-Knoxville ; Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Butler Hospital.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Springer Publishing)

DOI

10.1891/1946-6560.5.4.359

PMID

25332752

PMCID

PMC4201052

Abstract

Research has attempted to elucidate men and women's proximal motivations for perpetrating intimate partner violence (IPV). However, previous research has yet to clarify and resolve contention regarding whether motives for IPV are gender-neutral or gender specific. Thus, the purpose of this present study was to compare motives for physical IPV perpetration among a sample of men (n =90) and women (n =87) arrested for domestic violence and court-referred to batterer intervention programs.

RESULTS demonstrated that the most frequently endorsed motives for IPV by both men and women were self-defense, expression of negative emotions, and communication difficulties. With the exception of expression of negative emotions and retaliation, with women endorsing these motives more often than men, there were no significant differences between men and women's self-reported reasons for perpetrating physical aggression. The implications of these findings for future research and intervention programs are discussed.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print