Citation

Orhon R, Eren SH, Karadayı S, Korkmaz I, Coşkun A, Eren M, Katrancıoğlu N. Ulus. Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014; 20(4): 258-264.

Affiliation

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Cumhuriyet University Hospital, Sivas, Turkey.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dernegi)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

25135020

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we compared the anatomical, and physiological scoring systems trauma revised injury severity score (TRISS), revised trauma score (RTS), injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS) to each other, to find out the most accurate and reliable trauma score for the risk classification of morbidity and mortality among the trauma patients.

METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study, which included 633 patients who admitted to our University Hospital Emergency Department during an 8-month period due to trauma. All blunt and penetrating traumas (traffic accident, assault, etc.) patients above 16 years were included.

RESULTS: Arrival time trauma scores (ISS, NISS, RTS, and TRISS) of the patients was calculated. Mean trauma score for the mortality prediction was calculated, and the p value was equal for all (p=0.001). Trauma scores were also analyzed for the hospitalization time in intensive care unit (ICU). While NISS, RTS, and TRISS values were significant (p=0.048, p=0.048, and p=0.017, respectively), ISS value was not significant (p=0.257) for predicting the ICU hospitalization time. Only TRISS was a good predictor for the mechanically ventilation time in ICU patients (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we determined that the anatomical trauma scores (NISS, ISS) predicted the hospitalization and ICU necessities better, whereas TRISS, an anatomo-physiological trauma score, defined the ICU hospitalization and mechanically ventilation time better.

Language: en