Citation

Stormo KJ, Lang AR, Stritzke WGK. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1997; 27(4): 279-305.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00633.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Reactions to an acquaintance rape scenario were examined for effects of respondent gender and portrayals of different levels of alcohol intoxication on attributions of responsibility and blame. Comparisons of conditions in which both victim and perpetrator were described as experiencing equivalent levels of intoxication revealed that participants rated the victim as more, but the perpetrator as less, responsible and blameworthy after consuming alcohol-particularly when drinking was accompanied by clear signs of behavioral impairment. In contrast, when the victim was more intoxicated and impaired than her assailant, intoxication of the perpetrator did not serve to excuse his behavior, but actually incriminated him more. Women generally assigned more blame to the victim. Individual differences in rape myth acceptance also influenced attributions.