Citation

Greene E, Koehring H, Quiat M. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1998; 28(2): 145-156.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1998, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01697.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Victim impact evidence is introduced by the prosecution during the penalty phase of a capital case to describe the character of the victim and the emotional, financial, and physical impact of the victim's murder on survivors. In 1987, the Supreme Court voiced concern that this evidence would permit the capital sentencing decision to turn on jurors' perceptions of the victim's respectability. This study assesses that concern. Mock jurors watched a reenactment of the penalty phase in the case of Booth v. Maryland. We manipulated the respectability of the victim described in the victim impact evidence and found that jurors' judgments of the victims, victims' survivors, and severity of the crime were all affected by this description. We speculate on the way that these moderating variables could, in turn, influence the capital sentencing decision.