Citation

Johnston L, Hudson SM, Richardson MJ, Gunns RE, Garner M. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2004; 34(3): 514-537.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand. (e-mail: lucy.johnston@canterbury.ac.nz)

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02559.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Three experiments investigated whether women can change their walking style and hence reduce their vulnerability to physical attack. In Experiment 1, women were videotaped walking normally and when imagining themselves in a situation of low personal safety. Women were rated as harder to attack in the low safety condition. Differences in walking style accounted for differences in ease-of-attack ratings. Experiment 2 compared walking styles and vulnerability of women before and after completing a self-defense course. No differences were seen across sessions. Experiment 3 investigated walking styles and vulnerability of women before and after completing individualized walking training programs. Differences in vulnerability between sessions were revealed and could be accounted for by changes in walking-style features.