Citation

Gorelik G, Shackelford TK. Evol. Psychol. 2011; 9(4): 564-587.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA. gregory.gorelik33@gmail.com

Erratum On

Evol Psychol 2012;10(1):44.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, The Author(s), Publisher Ian Pitchford and Robert M. Young)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

22947995

Abstract

Coevolutionary arms races between males and females have equipped both sexes with mutually manipulative and defensive adaptations. These adaptations function to benefit individual reproductive interests at the cost of the reproductive interests of opposite-sex mates, and arise from evolutionary dynamics such as parental investment (unequal reproductive costs between the sexes) and sexual selection (unequal access to opposite-sex mates). Individuals use these adaptations to hijack others' reproductive systems, psychological states, and behaviors--essentially using other individuals as extended phenotypes of themselves. Such extended phenotypic manipulation of sexual rivals and opposite-sex mates is enacted by humans with the aid of hormones, pheromones, neurotransmitters, emotions, language, mind-altering substances, social institutions, technologies, and ideologies. Furthermore, sexual conflict may be experienced at an individual level when maternal genes and paternal genes are in conflict within an organism. Sexual conflict may be physically and emotionally destructive, but may also be exciting and constructive for relationships. By extending the biological concept of sexual conflict into social and cultural domains, scholars may successfully bridge many of the interdisciplinary gaps that separate the sciences from the humanities.

Language: en