BACKGROUND: Individuals with headache after TBI receive care in a wide variety of clinical locations by physicians trained in multiple specialties.
OBJECTIVE: To understand current practice patterns and perceptions of treatment issues among clinicians managing headache after TBI.
DESIGN: National survey of current clinical practice using a 20 item questionnaire developed by the authors. PARTICIPANTS: Survey respondents were members of the Central Nervous System Council list serve of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (N = 1782) and the American Headache Society membership (N = 1260).
METHODS: The survey was sent electronically to potential participants and was followed by two biweekly reminders. The survey queried the physician's clinical setting; their use of headache classification systems, headache diaries, checklists, and diagnostic procedures; the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments prescribed; headache chronicity and associated symptoms and disorders among their patients with TBI.
RESULTS: Completed surveys were received from 193 respondents. The use of standardized classification systems and checklists was commonly reported. Respondents used non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment approaches with similar frequency and modest perceived success rates. A high frequency of headache-associated new sleep and mood disorders was reported. When response differences occurred between practice settings, they reflected a focus on headache diagnosis, classification and pharmacologic treatment among neurology and specialty headache clinics; whereas a non-pharmacologic approach to management among TBI specialty and general rehabilitation clinicians was more commonly reported.
CONCLUSION: Management strategies for treating headache after TBI vary widely among general and specialty clinical practices. This suggests that additional research is needed that would lead to an increase in the use of established headache classification and the development of standardized management approaches so that all practitioners who care for patients after TBI can provide consistent, effective care.