Citation

Harrington JR, Gelfand MJ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014; 111(22): 7990-7995.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 jesserh@umd.edu mgelfand@umd.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, National Academy of Sciences)

DOI

10.1073/pnas.1317937111

PMID

24843116

Abstract

This research demonstrates wide variation in tightness-looseness (the strength of punishment and degree of latitude/permissiveness) at the state level in the United States, as well as its association with a variety of ecological and historical factors, psychological characteristics, and state-level outcomes. Consistent with theory and past research, ecological and man-made threats-such as a higher incidence of natural disasters, greater disease prevalence, fewer natural resources, and greater degree of external threat-predicted increased tightness at the state level. Tightness is also associated with higher trait conscientiousness and lower trait openness, as well as a wide array of outcomes at the state level. Compared with loose states, tight states have higher levels of social stability, including lowered drug and alcohol use, lower rates of homelessness, and lower social disorganization. However, tight states also have higher incarceration rates, greater discrimination and inequality, lower creativity, and lower happiness relative to loose states. In all, tightness-looseness provides a parsimonious explanation of the wide variation we see across the 50 states of the United States of America.

Language: en