SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yamazaki J, Yoshida M, Mizunuma H. Injury 2014; 45(8): 1196-1206.

Affiliation

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan. Electronic address: mizunuma@tmu.ac.jp.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.014

PMID

24810668

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We explored several modes of violent shaking using a dummy doll with an eyeball model to reproduce abusive events that lead to retinal haemorrhages (RH) seen in shaken baby syndrome or abusive head trauma (SBS/AHT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dummy doll equipped with an eyeball model was prepared. The eyeball model was filled with a model of vitreous body, i.e. agar gel or water, and was with a pressure sensor to measure normal stress.

RESULTS: The modes of shaking were classified into three patterns, i.e. fast shaking with the fore arms, fast shaking with the whole arms and synchronized shaking with the whole arms. The frequency of the cyclic acceleration-deceleration history experienced by the head of the dummy doll was 5.0, 4.0 and 2.2Hz, respectively, with the maximum acceleration of 20, 20 and 60m/s(2), respectively. We considered the last of these three modes of shaking as possibly corresponding to the worst case of violent shaking. This mode of shaking could be instructed to volunteers who acted as imitate perpetrators, and resulted in both increased peak intensities of the acceleration experienced by the head of the dummy doll and increased stresses on the retina at the posterior pole of the eyeball model.

DISCUSSION: The time integral of the stress through a single cycle of shaking was 107Pa·s, much larger than that of a single event of fall, which resulted in 60-73Pa·s. Taking into account that abusive shaking is likely to include multiple cycles, the time integral of the stress due to abusive shaking can be even larger. This clear difference may explain why RH in SBS/AHT is frequent, while RH in accidental falls is rare.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print