Citation

Gillett G, Hankey R. J. Bioeth. Inq. 2014; 11(2): 173-180.

Affiliation

Otago Bioethics Centre, University of Otago Medical School, 201 Great King St., Dunedin, PO Box 913, New Zealand, grant.gillett@otago.ac.nz.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Bioethics Centre, University of Otago)

DOI

10.1007/s11673-014-9513-8

PMID

24771522

Abstract

Euripides' Alcestis (1959) raises the issue of ethical duties within families and exposes the romantic postures and rhetoric that can dominate such discussions. Should anybody be asked to sacrifice themselves or even undergo significant health risks for members of their own family? (An issue that is also relevant in considering our duties to future generations in terms of the earth we leave to them.) The issue that is dramatized to a heroic level in Alcestis arises in live organ and tissue donation within a family and challenges the idea that families should be trusted to sort out solutions that they can all live with. Alcestis intensifies the debate because the sacrifice of one life for another is its topic but, in doing so, it exposes many traps lying in wait for ethicists and medical jurists who boldly enter such debates (where emotions create shifting ground on which angels fear to tread).

Language: en