Citation

Edleson JL, Gassman-Pines J, Hill MB. Soc. Work 2006; 51(2): 167-174.

Affiliation

School of Social Work, University of Minnesota, St Paul 55018, USA. jedleson@umn.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, National Association of Social Workers)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

16858922

Abstract

Policymakers are increasingly focusing on children exposed to domestic violence. The 1999 Minnesota legislature amended the definition of child neglect to include a child's exposure to family violence.What was initially seen as a simple change to bring more attention to children exposed to domestic violence resulted in great turmoil across Minnesota's county-run child protection system. Referrals to county child protection agencies expanded rapidly in the months following the law change, and no new state funding was provided to implement the legislation. A coalition of child welfare administrators and battered women's advocates successfully lobbied for the repeal of this change in definition. Many were dissatisfied with both the impact of the legislation and the fact that exposed children and their families were left without badly needed services. This article reconstructs how Minnesota's legislature made this change, its consequences, and the lessons that may be drawn from this experience.

Language: en