Citation

O'Keefe M. J. Clin. Forensic Med. 2001; 8(2): 57-65.

Affiliation

Principal Police Surgeon, 'Q' Division Strathclyde Police, Campbell Street, Hamilton.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1054/jcfm.2001.0485

PMID

15274973

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the opinion of police surgeons within Strathclyde Police to the proposed introduction of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) in the assessment of suspect drivers. METHOD: 25 police surgeons who attended a full day training programme in respect of 'Drugs and Driving' received a questionnaire relating to the tests. Following analysis of the responses, an identical questionnaire was posted to all 101 registered police surgeons in Strathclyde, resulting in a 45% response and results compared. RESULTS: Of the conference attendees, 54% of doctors were satisfied with the tests, while 46% expressed reservations. Each test was considered separately, however the Walk and Turn Test and the One Leg Stand Test caused the highest levels of concern from at least 50% of the doctors. POSTAL RESPONSES: 52% were satisfied with the tests, however 48% expressed concerns. Again, the Walk and Turn Test and the One Leg Stand Test were by far the tests causing most concern. CONCLUSIONS: a significant percentage of police surgeons in Strathclyde have expressed concerns regarding the SFSTs. Irrespective of length of experience and postgraduate qualification, the tests most contentious are the Walk and Turn Test and the One Leg Stand Test.

Language: en