Citation

Swensen EE, Purswell JL, Schlegel RE, Stanevich RL. Hum. Factors 1992; 34(1): 67-77.

Affiliation

University of Oklahoma, Norman 73019.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1577504

Abstract

Research was conducted to determine how well subjects could distinguish between surfaces with different coefficient of friction (COF) values and to evaluate how well subjective ratings of slipperiness correlated with the actual COF values. Thirty-three ironworkers experienced in working and walking on steel surfaces and 23 university students inexperienced with these tasks participated in the study. Subjective slipperiness ratings for a variety of climbing and walking conditions were obtained from the subjects. It was found that subjects could identify differences in the slipperiness of four types of steel coatings tested in the study. There was a high correlation between the subjective ratings and the measured COF values. Subjects did not slip at a COF of 0.41 but did lose footing at a COF of 0.20.