CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Fraga S, Lindert J, Barros H, Torres-Gonzalez F, Ioannidi-Kapolou E, Melchiorre MG, Stankunas M, Soares JF. Prev. Med. 2014; 61: 42-47. |
|
Affiliation |
Department of Health Sciences, Section of Public Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Publishing) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
24440160 |
|
Abstract |
OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of elder abuse using a multilevel approach that takes into account the characteristics of participants as well as socioeconomic indicators at city and country level. METHODS: In 2009, the project on abuse of elderly in Europe (ABUEL) was conducted in seven cities (Stuttgart, Germany; Ancona, Italy; Kaunas, Lithuania, Stockholm, Sweden; Porto, Portugal; Granada, Spain; Athens, Greece) comprising 4,467 individuals aged 60-84years. We used a 3-level hierarchical structure of data: 1) characteristics of participants; 2) mean of tertiary education of each city; 3)country inequality indicator (Gini coefficient). Multilevel logistic regression was used and proportional changes in Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were inspected to assert explained variance between models. RESULTS: The prevalence of elder abuse showed large variations across sites. Adding tertiary education to the regression model reduced the country level variance for psychological abuse (ICC=3.4%), with no significant decrease in the explained variance for the other types of abuse. When the Gini coefficient was considered, the highest drop in ICC was observed for financial abuse (from 9.5% to 4.3%). CONCLUSION: There is a societal and community level dimension that adds information to individual variability in explaining country differences in elder abuse, highlighting underlying socioeconomic inequalities leading to such behavior. Language: en |