Citation

Waters TM, Chandler AM, Mion LC, Daniels MJ, Kessler LA, Miller ST, Shorr RI. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2013; 61(12): 2186-2191.

Affiliation

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/jgs.12539

PMID

24329820

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare falls and fall-related injuries that a fall evaluator or hospital incident report identified with injuries identified according to discharge International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for the same set of inpatient episodes of care. DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive study. SETTING: Sixteen adult general medical and surgical units in a major urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All adults who sustained a fall with injury during a 5-year period (380 falls with injury). MEASUREMENTS: Falls that a fall evaluator or hospital incident report identified were classified according to their injury severity. Discharge abstracts provided diagnosis codes (ICD-9-CM) for the discharge, including fall-related injury codes. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-three inpatient falls with injury (90.2%) resulted in temporary harm to the individual; the remaining 37 falls (9.8%) resulted in more-serious harm. Sixteen of the 37 falls with injury extending hospitalization or resulting in death were identified using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-targeted injury code ranges combined with present-on-admission indicators. Of the 21 falls with injury that were not identified, nine (42.9%) lacked documentation of any injury, and seven (33.3%) identified other injuries outside the CMS-targeted injury code ranges. CONCLUSION: The CMS-targeted ICD-9-CM codes used to identify fall-related injuries in claims data do not always detect the most-serious falls.

Language: en