CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Farhadbeigi P, Bagherian F, Banaraki AK. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012; 32: 49-52. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Publishing) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
unavailable |
|
Abstract |
INTRODUCTION: Judgment in Cognitive Continuum Theory is assumed as a continuum between intuition pole and analysis pole. This study has accessed speed and accuracy in three modes of judgment. METHOD: Professional judgments have been provided by 56 participants through an experimental group (under stress) and a control group (without stress). RESULT: Accuracy was significantly higher in control group in all three judgments. Reaction times had difference significantly just in quasi-rational judgments. CONCLUSION: stressor lowered accuracy in the three modes of judgments in the experimental group. Noise stressor seemed to have increased reaction times in middle of judgment continuum. |