Citation

Featherstone B. Br. J. Soc. Work 1997; 27(3): 419-433.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, Oxford University Press)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article explores the lack of impact that feminism has had on analyses of physical abuse. It links this to the kinds of feminist theory which have been used to explore family violence generally. These have been based on fixed notions of men, women and children. It argues for perspectives which are characterized by an appreciation that gendered positions are neither fixed nor inevitable, but, rather, subject to constant struggle and redefinition. It argues that the concept of power may not be the most helpful concept to use when exploring emotional relationships which are characterized by vulnerability and dependency, and that the concept of domination may be more helpful. Finally, the paper draws on the work of Virginia Goldner and her associates to posit the possibility of working on a number of levels, from the psychological to the material. (Abstract Adapted from Source: British Journal of Social Work, 2002. Copyright © 2002 by British Association of Social Workers, Oxford University Press)

Feminist Theory
Female Violence
Female Offender
Adult Violence
Adult Parent
Adult Offender
Adult Mother
Adult Female
Adult Father
Adult Male
Male Offender
Male Violence
Parent Offender
Child Abuse Offender
Child Abuse Causes
Child Physical Abuse Offender
Child Physical Abuse Causes
Domestic Violence Causes
Domestic Violence Offender
Gender Differences
08-02