CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Schopp RF, Slain AJ. Behav. Sci. Law 2000; 18(2-3): 247-274. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2000, John Wiley and Sons) |
|
DOI |
10.1002/1099-0798(200003/06)18:2/3<247::AID-BSL399>3.0.CO;2-W |
PMID |
unavailable |
|
Abstract |
Recent judicial decisions regarding commitment under sexual predator statutes and commentary addressing the legal significance of psychopathy provide an interesting opportunity to reflect upon the exculpatory significance of psychopathy and the appropriate relationship between criminal conviction and police power civil commitment. This paper examines the legal significance of psychopathy for the purposes of criminal responsibility and of civil commitment under sexual predator statutes. By examining the significance of psychopathy for each of these legal institutions, it clarifies our understanding of the legal significance of psychopathy and of the relationship between these institutions. This process illuminates the defensible functions and boundaries of each institution and clarifies the nature of the impairment that should qualify an individual for confinement by each. This analysis interprets criminal conviction and police power commitment, including sexual predator commitment, as integrated institutions of social control intended to provide a coherent approach to psychopaths as well as to others who require state intervention under the police power. (Abstract Adapted from Source: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2000. Copyright © 2000 by John Wiley and Sons) |