Citation

Cavender G. Criminology 1984; 22(2): 203-213.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1984, American Society of Criminology)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The justice model has emerged as an alternative to the discredited rehabilitative ideal as a basis for sanctioning policy. Retributivism or just deserts is offered as the primary justification for the criminal sanction in this model, although sometimes in combination with incapacitation and deterrence as companion rationales for sanctioning. Desert is, additionally, an integral component of a sense of justice that is presented as an attribute of the justice model. Desert, both as a rationale for sanctions and as the basis for justice, is drawn from the philosophical models of Immanuel Kant and John Rawis. However, these models have some rather disturbing implications that have not been addressed by proponents of the justice model. A critical examination of them and their implications for criminology is therefore in order. (Abstract Adapted from Source: Criminology, 1984. Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Criminology)

Correctional Decision Making
Criminal Justice System
Offender Sentencing
Offender Rehabilitation
Offender Treatment
Offender Punishment
Justice System Model
Adult Crime
Adult Offender
12-04