Citation

Paul C, Derrett S, McAllister S, Herbison P, Beaver C, Sullivan M. Spinal Cord 2013; 51(12): 919-925.

Affiliation

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, International Spinal Cord Society, Publisher Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1038/sc.2013.110

PMID

24081018

Abstract

Study design:Longitudinal cohort study.OBJECTIVES:To estimate socioeconomic and work outcomes over 2 and a half years following spinal cord injury (SCI), and to compare those in receipt of compensation (Accident Compensation Corporation, ACC) and those not.Setting:People admitted to the two spinal units in 2007-2009 in New Zealand, where there is a unique no-fault compensation scheme for injury.METHODS:Interviews were conducted at ∼6, 18 and 30 months after SCI and data collected on pre-SCI and post-SCI health and socioeconomic characteristics. Poisson regression, quantile regression and a linear mixed model regression were used to compare differences in outcomes.RESULTS:Of the 162 eligible people, 118 (73%) participated and 91(77%) were followed to 30 months; 79% received ACC. Median personal income, self-reported standard of living and household income adequacy all fell slightly to 18 months and then stabilized at 30 months. At that time, 49% had returned to paid work. Among those not eligible for ACC, income fell to less than half the ACC group (P<0.006 after adjustment), and return to work was lower (29% versus 54%).CONCLUSION:The findings that most people retained their economic status and that return to work was relatively high appear to be due to the proportion entitled to the ACC no-fault compensation scheme for injury; with earnings-related compensation, a focus on rehabilitation to work and non-means-tested support services. This situation should mitigate against the downward spiral into poverty and further ill-health.Spinal Cord advance online publication, 1 October 2013; doi:10.1038/sc.2013.110.

Language: en