Citation

Gulbrandsen C. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 2013; 79(3): 505-522.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, International Institute of Administrative Sciences, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0020852313489947

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Arguably, the EU represents a qualitatively different international order from traditional intergovernmental international organizations (IOs), as it has accumulated functions and capacities beyond these. This article compares how the EU and the International Maritime Organization impact three aspects of a national agency's implementation of international rules: application, conflicts over policy agendas and how it deals with non-compliance. Interviews reveal the EU and the IMO as more similar than expected, but still different. Whereas application seems impacted by various supporting functions of both IOs, the EU's heavy enforcement mechanisms may possibly hamper the detection of non-compliance and its independent agenda-setting powers may create animosity among national officials over the content of EU rules.

Points for practitioners This article not only outlines similarities and differences between the EU and the IMO within the maritime safety sector, it also helps identify various channels whereby different types of IOs may impact national administrative processes. It should be of interest to those who work with construction and management of international regimes, as it explores practical effects they may have.

Language: en