Citation

Jaegers L, Dale AM, Weaver N, Buchholz B, Welch L, Evanoff B. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2014; 57(3): 351-361.

Affiliation

Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri; Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, St Louis, Missouri.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/ajim.22249

PMID

24006097

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intervention studies in participatory ergonomics (PE) are often difficult to interpret due to limited descriptions of program planning and evaluation. METHODS: In an ongoing PE program with floor layers, we developed a logic model to describe our program plan, and process and summative evaluations designed to describe the efficacy of the program. RESULTS: The logic model was a useful tool for describing the program elements and subsequent modifications. The process evaluation measured how well the program was delivered as intended, and revealed the need for program modifications. The summative evaluation provided early measures of the efficacy of the program as delivered. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate information on program delivery may lead to erroneous conclusions about intervention efficacy due to Type III error. A logic model guided the delivery and evaluation of our intervention and provides useful information to aid interpretation of results. Am. J. Ind. Med. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Language: en