Citation

Kelly DL, Larkin HJ, Cosby CD, Paolinetti LA. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2013; 20(6): 724-731.

Affiliation

Alameda County Medical Center, Highland, Department of Emergency Medicine, 1411 E. 31st Street, Oakland, CA 94602, United States. Electronic address: dkelly@acmedctr.org.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jflm.2013.04.012

PMID

23910870

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Inconsistencies abound in the current forensic literature regarding the definition, and as a result, the significance of female genital injury after sexual intercourse. These definitions are based on variables related to the anatomic locations that are examined, the actual physical findings types, and the methods used to detect the findings. PURPOSE: To derive and perform initial clinimetric analyses on a simple instrument that defines, and based on severity, quantifies external genital injury after sexual intercourse. The scale utilizes standard injury definitions and a standardized examination method. METHODS: After empirical investigation, it was determined that the application of the tool would require the use of magnification and toluidine blue in order to have the sensitivity to detect the majority of injuries that occur after sexual intercourse. Separate matrices were constructed based on anatomic locations and injury types from data collected from sexual assault genital injury examination forms. Principal Components Analyses were applied. A clinical model was constructed from the resultant variables, utilizing operational definitions and forming a template for the instrument. RESULTS: A twelve-factor instrument measuring five variables along five "types" of severity and two "classes" of severity ensued. The resultant instrument was tested for internal consistency and differential validity. Very good internal consistency was attained (Cronbach's Coefficient α = 0.8). In a pilot study, the scale was able to distinguish a cohort of sexual assault patients from one of consensual intercourse subjects based on type and class of injury (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The findings presented demonstrate that while employing a standardized examination method, the Genital Injury Severity Scale has utility in defining and measuring external genital injury after sexual intercourse.

Language: en