SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Singleton JA, Gibb IE, Hunt NC, Bull AM, Clasper JC. BMJ Open 2013; 3(8): 2013-003130.

Affiliation

Imperial College London, Centre for Blast Injury Studies, London, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003130

PMID

23906957

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify potentially fatal injury patterns in explosive blast fatalities in order to focus research and mitigation strategies, to further improve survival rates from blast trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: UK military personnel killed by improvised explosive device (IED) blasts in Afghanistan, November 2007-August 2010. SETTING: UK military deployment, through NATO, in support of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission in Afghanistan. DATA SOURCES: UK military postmortem CT records, UK Joint Theatre Trauma Registry and associated incident data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Potentially fatal injuries attributable to IEDs. RESULTS: We identified 121 cases, 42 mounted (in-vehicle) and 79 dismounted (on foot), at a point of wounding. There were 354 potentially fatal injuries in total. Leading causes of death were traumatic brain injury (50%, 62/124 fatal injuries), followed by intracavity haemorrhage (20.2%, 25/124) in the mounted group, and extremity haemorrhage (42.6%, 98/230 fatal injuries), junctional haemorrhage (22.2%, 51/230 fatal injuries) and traumatic brain injury (18.7%, 43/230 fatal injuries) in the dismounted group. CONCLUSIONS: Head trauma severity in both mounted and dismounted IED fatalities indicated prevention and mitigation as the most effective strategies to decrease resultant mortality. Two-thirds of dismounted fatalities had haemorrhage implicated as a cause of death that may have been anatomically amenable to prehospital intervention. One-fifth of the mounted fatalities had haemorrhagic trauma which currently could only be addressed surgically. Maintaining the drive to improve all haemostatic techniques for blast casualties, from point of wounding to definitive surgical proximal vascular control, alongside the development and application of novel haemostatic interventions could yield a significant survival benefit. Prospective studies in this field are indicated.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print