SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Chen S, Sussman ES. Biol. Psychol. 2013; 94(2): 297-309.

Affiliation

Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Center of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Boston University. Electronic address: sufen.chen@einstein.yu.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.07.005

PMID

23886958

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to test the hypothesis that sound context modulates the magnitude of auditory distraction, indexed by behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Participants were asked to identify tone duration, while irrelevant changes occurred in tone frequency, tone intensity, and harmonic structure. Frequency deviants were randomly intermixed with standards (Uni-Condition), with intensity deviants (Bi-Condition), and with both intensity and complex deviants (Tri-Condition). Only in the Tri-Condition did the auditory distraction effect reflect the magnitude difference among the frequency and intensity deviants. The mixture of the different types of deviants in the Tri-Condition modulated the perceived level of distraction, demonstrating that the sound context can modulate the effect of deviance level on processing irrelevant acoustic changes in the environment. These findings thus indicate that perceptual contrast plays a role in change detection processes that leads to auditory distraction.


Keywords: Driver distraction;


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print