Citation

Crevecoeur F, Kurtzer IL, Bourke T, Scott SH. J. Neurophysiol. 2013; 110(6): 1323-1332.

Affiliation

Queen's University.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, American Physiological Society)

DOI

10.1152/jn.00216.2013

PMID

23825396

Abstract

Healthy subjects can easily produce voluntary actions at different speeds and with varying accuracy requirements. It remains unknown whether rapid corrective responses to mechanical perturbations also possess this flexibility and, thereby, contribute to the capability expressed in voluntary control. Paralleling previous studies on self-initiated movements, we examined how muscle activity was impacted by either implicit or explicit criteria affecting the urgency to respond to the perturbation. Participants maintained their arm position against torque perturbations with unpredictable timing and direction. In the first experiment, the urgency to respond was explicitly altered by varying the time limit (300ms versus 700ms) to return to a small target. A second experiment addresses implicit urgency criteria by varying the radius of the goal target, such that task accuracy could be achieved with less vigorous corrections for large targets than small target. We show that muscle responses at ~60 ms scaled with the task demand. Moreover, in both experiments, we found a strong inter-trial correlation between long-latency responses (~50 - 100 ms) and the movement reversal times, which emphasizes that these rapid motor responses are directly linked to behavioural performance. The slopes of these linear regressions were sensitive to the experimental condition during the long-latency and early voluntary epochs. These findings suggest that feedback gains for very rapid responses are flexibly scaled according to task-related urgency.

Language: en