Citation

Smith RD, Petticrew M. J. Public Health (Oxford) 2010; 32(1): 2-7.

Affiliation

Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Richard.Smith@lshtm.ac.uk

Comment In:

J Public Health (Oxf) 2010;32(1):1.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/pubmed/fdp122

PMID

20181759

Abstract

This paper argues that concepts, methodologies and practices within public health need further development if they are to be sufficient to allow us to develop, undertake and evaluate interventions in the twenty-first century. The public health profession, and the disciplines that contribute to it, maintains the historical focus upon detailed micro analysis (individual and health sector) and not broader macro analysis (societal and system). This brief paper suggests why this is and outlines three challenges it poses: specifying and evaluating outcomes; specifying and understanding complex causal pathways in social interventions and the development of multisector evaluation, to meet information demands from multiple stakeholders. While there is general agreement that public health evaluation needs development, this paper argues that the focus needs to be more upon a broader evaluative space than is currently practiced. There is a need to move beyond primary and secondary health-related effects upon individuals, and focus more on evaluation of the wider range and distribution of direct and indirect effects upon individuals, communities and populations. That is, those involved in public health evaluation need to step back and first consider the wood before focusing in on specific trees.

Language: en