SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Henley M, Davis RC, Smith BE. Int. Rev. Victimology 1994; 3(1-2): 83-93.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1994, World Society of Victimology, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/026975809400300206

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper details the results of two studies that document the reactions of prosecutors and judges to victim impact statements. Criminal justice officials were asked for their views on the principle of introducing victim impact statements into the criminal justice system and were questioned about their experiences with a program to prepare and distribute victim impact statements. Both studies found that most prosecutors and judges support victim impact statements in theory. Yet, when presented with victim impact statements and asked to integrate them into their established routines, a significant proportion of officials resisted in various ways. Explanations for the observed resistance are explored.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print