Citation

Cavadino M, Dignan J. Int. Rev. Victimology 1997; 4(4): 233-253.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, World Society of Victimology, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/026975809700400401

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between the idea that offenders should make reparation to their victims and the principle of 'just deserts' or strict proportionality between seriousness of offence and severity of punishment. Some have queried whether these notions are compatible with each other, suggesting that there is relatively little scope for reparative measures in a criminal justice system soundly based on the principle of just deserts.
We defend the reparative principle, arguing that reparation should play a significant rôle in a criminal justice system based on the human rights of victims as well as offenders. Such a rights-based approach also has an important place for the retributive notion of just deserts, but strict proportionality is rejected in favour of an approach whereby the offender's just deserts set upper and lower limits on the sanctions which may be imposed on the offender. Within these limits there should be scope for both victims and offenders to have a say in the nature, form and amount of reparation which is appropriate.

Language: en