Citation

Berndt A. Proc. Australas. Road Safety Res. Policing Educ. Conf. 2002; 6(1): 21-30.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, copyright holder varies, Publisher Monash University)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Currently there are few systems either under fitness to drive or pedestrian safety guidelines to inform assessment of the capacity or the safety of the user. In addition, there are no formal mechanisms to check the ongoing safety of users who have purchased equipment when appropriate who then go on to develop cognitive or visual dysfunction. This paper will use a recent actual clinical case study involving referral, assessment, intervention and evaluation, to highlight issues. The issues include: gaps in information required, differing training of health personnel, constraints to training, poor road design, risks to users and the community, lack of monitoring systems and potential legal liabilities. This paper offers those who are not involved in the area of mobility rehabilitation an opportunity to glimpse the complex array of emerging issues involved in the safe prescription and ongoing utilisation of what seems a superficially straightforward piece of mobility equipment. The discussion contributes to the ongoing debate regarding the systems issues in regard to motorised mobility devices.