Citation

Mori M. J. Med. Ethics 2013; 39(5): 317-322.

Affiliation

Department of Philosophy, University of Turin, via Sant'Ottavio 20, Torino 10124, Italy. maurizio.mori@unito.it.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/medethics-2013-101403

PMID

23637439

Abstract

From 28 February to the end of March 2012, the Italian media reacted fiercely to the Giubilini and Minerva paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics a few days earlier. The first article viewed the proposal as analogous to 'barbaric invasions', but in a first stage of the debate it could be seen as a case of the usual controversy between Catholics and secularists. Then emotive reactions prevailed and a flood of papers expressed strong opposition to 'infanticide'. The authors were even deemed insane; the fact that both are Italian certainly increased interest in the subject as well as surprise at their proposal, which some reckoned to be an insult to their 'national identity'. Even freedom of academic research and discussion was put in question, and defenders of free debate were accused of being supporters of the theory of infanticide.

Language: en