Citation

Venara A, Jousset N, Airagnes G, Arnaud JP, Rougé-Maillart C. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2013; 20(4): 270-273.

Affiliation

LUNAM, University of Angers, France; University of Angers, Angers University Hospital, Forensic Medicine Department, Angers, France; University of Angers, Angers University Hospital, Visceral Surgery Department, Angers, France.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jflm.2012.09.004

PMID

23622473

Abstract

Intentional penetrating wounds, self inflicted or inflicted by others, are increasingly common. As a result, it can be difficult for the forensic examiner to determine whether the cause is self-inflicted or not. This type of trauma has been studied from a psychological perspective and from a surgical perspective but the literature concerning the forensic perspective is poorer. The objective of this study was to compare the epidemiology of abdominal stab wounds so as to distinguish specific features of each type. This could help the forensic scientist to determine the manner of infliction of the wound. We proposed a retrospective monocentric study that included all patients with an abdominal wound who were managed by the visceral surgery department at Angers University Hospital. Demographic criteria, patient history, circumstances and location of the wound were noted and compared. A comparison was drawn between group 1 (self inflicted wound) and group 2 (assault). This study showed that the only significant differences are represented by the patient's prior history and the circumstances surrounding the wound, i.e. the scene and time of day. In our study, neither the site, nor the injuries sustained reveal significant clues as to the origin of the wound. According to our findings, in order to determine the cause, the forensic examiner should thus carefully study the circumstances and any associated injuries.

Language: en