CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Basile S. J. Fam. Violence 2005; 20(3): 171-179. |
|
Affiliation |
Fatherhood Coalition, Milford, Massachusetts; North Central Chapter, Fatherhood Coalition, 29 Harrington Road, Westminster, Massachusetts, 01473 |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2005, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
unavailable |
|
Abstract |
Are male victims of domestic violence provided the same protections as female victims? With increasing entanglement of custody and domestic violence law, the answer to this question is critical for fathers embroiled in disputes where allegations are sometimes made to secure custody of children. All non-impounded requests for Abuse Prevention Orders initiated in Massachusetts Gardner District Court, in the year 1997, involving opposite gender litigants were analyzed to determine if court response to the associated allegations is affected by the gender of those litigants. These orders were previously examined and male and female defendants were found similarly abusive. By studying the characteristics of each case, and overall court response at court hearings, a determination is made concerning any evident gender trends in the aggregate court response to requests for protection. Despite gender-neutral language of abuse prevention law (M.G.L. c. 209A), application of that law favors female plaintiffs. |